What a Sage migration exposes before the new ERP goes live
Acumatica published a useful comparison for businesses replacing Sage 50 or Sage 300 this week. It describes two broad routes. A finance-first move may suit
Read the pieceTopic
Acumatica published a useful comparison for businesses replacing Sage 50 or Sage 300 this week. It describes two broad routes. A finance-first move may suit
Read the pieceEighty-odd episodes of this podcast and almost every one has pointed the same direction. Outgrow the spreadsheets. Get off the paper. Upgrade the system. Migrate
Read the pieceThe thing keeping you on a system everyone hates isn't the system. It's the scar tissue from the first migration. And round two is a different project — easier, better understood, and mostly a matter of not squandering everything you learned the first time.
Read the pieceERP upgrades shouldn't be exciting. If yours are, you're probably paying for decisions you made years ago. Here's why boring upgrades are the mark of a healthy ERP.
Read the pieceWhen you replace an ERP, you're ending a ten-year conversation between people and software. That conversation is messy, half-finished, and full of
Read the pieceChoosing the wrong ERP is one of the most expensive mistakes a business can make. A company sits through a slick demo, falls for the system
Read the pieceEvery ERP project ends up at the same fork in the road. Upgrade what you have, or migrate to something new. Most teams pick badly — not
Read the pieceCan you actually implement an ERP in six months? The short answer is yes — but only if five specific conditions are true. If any one of them is missing, you're not running a six-month ERP project. You're running a twelve-month one with a six-month deadline strapped to it.
Read the pieceCompanies spend months selecting the right ERP. They go through procurement, get board approval, sign the contract, and everyone gets excited. Then, three months into the
Read the piece